Your project paper will be evaluated based on a conference paper review form, except
that numeric weights are assigned to the parts. 

======================================================================

Paper writeup [100 points]


Appropriateness for DL course [10 points] 
        5: Definitely 
        4: Probably 
        3: Uncertain 
        2: Probably not 
        1: Certainly not 

Correctness: Does the paper appear to be flawed technically and/or
methodologically [10 points]? 
        5: Impeccable (12 points)
        4: The paper is OK (10 points)
        3: Only trivial flaws (9 points)
        2: Minor flaws that must be corrected (8 points)
        1: Major flaws that make the paper unsound/inconsistent (2 points)

Check Technical Details [8 points]: 

Writing style [7 points]: 

Significance: How important is the work [10 points]? 
        5: Will change the future (14 points)
        4: People will read and cite this paper (10 points)
        3: Restricted interest (9 points)
        2: Not of compelling interest (7 points)
        1: Will have no impact on the field (3 points)

Originality: How novel is the approach [15 points]?  
        5: A radically new approach (18 points)
        4: An innovative use (15 points)
        3: A new application of well known techniques (12 points)
        2: Yet another application of well worn techniques (10 points)
        1: Entirely derivative (7 points)

Evaluation: Does this paper contain information about evaluation [15 points]? 
        Excellent (15 points)
        Good (12 points)
        OK (10 points)
        Lack (Should have contained some evaluation, but it didn't; 
           or it did but the evaluation was bogus) (8 points)
        Not Apply (12 points)
	No evaluation, but there should have been (5 points)

Clarity: Is it clear what was done [15 points]? 
        5: Presentation is very clear (15 points)
        4: Difficult, but understandable (12 points)
        3: Some parts were not clear to me (10 points)
        2: Most of the paper is unclear (8 points)
        1: Presentation is very confusing (6 points)

References: Is the bibliography relevant and exhaustive [10 points]
        5: Thorough (10 points)
        4: Pretty good, but a few missing (9 points)
        3: Some citations, but some missing (8 points)
        2: Scrappy citations; a lot missing (5 points)
        1: Virtually no relevant references cited (2 points)

=================================================================================================

Project Presentation [100 points]

       Oral presentation quality [70 points]

       Slide Quality [20 points]

       Questions asked/answered during presentation [10 points]

=================================================================================================

Acknowlegement to Min-Yen Kan: http://www.comp.nus.edu.sg/~kanmy/courses/5244_2005/projectRubric.txt